join now
newsletters
topics
topics
advertise with us ABA Journal Blawg 100 Award 2009 ABA Journal Blawg 100 Award 2008
Subscribe (RSS Feed)TechnoLawyer Feed

Supreme Court Nominee John Roberts on Intellectual Property -- and Other Hot IP Issues

By Sara Skiff | Friday, July 29, 2005

Coming August 1, 2005 to IP Memes: You'll learn the outcome of a recent court battle involving members of a famous rock band, what the Federal Circuit's decision regarding patent cases and the dictionary means for you, how President Bush's new Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts' has ruled on intellectual property cases, why Illinois' new law against violent video games may run afoul of the First Amendment, and how archiving old Web pages resulted in a lawsuit (one that Google is probably watching closely given its famous cache).

How to Receive this Newsletter
Published on Mondays, IP Memes is a biweekly newsletter that explores emerging technology-related intellectual property issues — or "memes" as we call them. Like all of our newsletters, it's free. Please subscribe now.

Topics: Coming Attractions | IP Memes | Technology Industry/Legal Profession

Why Are Legal Vendors So Shy?

By Neil J. Squillante | Tuesday, July 26, 2005

Many legal vendors inexplicably hide their senior executives, especially their founders. Good luck finding bios of these people on many legal vendor Web sites.  Are these executives shy?

Actually, I shouldn't even joke because it's a serious marketing flaw that probably costs a lot of sales. With all the scams out there nowadays, you must establish trust.  Executive bios do exactly that.

If you're Apple or Microsoft and have spent billions on your brand to establish familiarity and trust, you need not worry so much about this issue (though to their credit, both of these companies provide executive bios on their respective Web sites).

Most legal vendors don't have this luxury. Instead, they must establish trust when lawyers unfamiliar with their products visit their Web site by way of a TechnoLawyer newsletter or other such source.

Executive bios reassure lawyers that the legal vendor and its are products are legitimate. By contrast, when bios don't exist exist, lawyers may conclude that the legal vendor has something to hide (e.g., an undercapitalized home business).

I myself tend not to buy products from small businesses with which I'm unfamiliar if I cannot find out who runs the company (a poorly designed Web site also turns me off, but that's a topic for another day).

Fortunately, some legal vendors understand that making their executives more accessible can boost sales. For example, CaseSoft not only provides bios of its two founders, but also tells a story about how they started the company. No surprise here since CaseSoft has built its rapidly growing software business in large part by making its founders so accessible (e.g., CEO Greg Krehel personally writes all of the company's TechnoLawyer advertisements and lists his e-mail address in each ad).

Another favorite example of mine comes from outside the legal profession. When you make a purchase at Saks Fifth Avenue, your receipt lists the name and e-mail address of the store manager. In a future post, I'll discuss how this best practice resulted in a sale that Saks would have otherwise lost.

In the meantime, I hope this post will encourage more legal vendors to begin making their executives more accessible. Adding executive bios to their Web site is a good first step -- and costs virtually nothing. What do you think?

About TechnoEditorials
A TechnoEditorial is the vehicle through which we opine and provide tips of interest to managing partners, law firm administrators, and others in the legal profession. TechnoEditorials appear first in TechnoGuide, and later here in TechnoLawyer Blog. TechnoGuide, which is free, also contains exclusive content. You can subscribe here.

Topics: Law Firm Marketing/Publications/Web Sites | Technology Industry/Legal Profession | TL Editorial

Canon v. Ricoh in a Law Office; Review of FileCenter; Dell Tech Support; Much More

By Neil J. Squillante | Friday, July 22, 2005

Coming August 1, 2005 to Answers to Questions: James Hole discusses a fascinating head-to-head test of a Canon and Ricoh digital copier conducted by his firm. The results were so astonishing that the representative from one of the copier companies ended up switching jobs to work for the other company. Also in this newsletter, Stephen Nipper reviews FileCenter and FileBackup, Rodrick Enns discusses his recent experience with Dell's tech support, Kim Mayberry explains how FileCenter works with regard to scanning, and David Hirsch discusses how his firm uses Lotus Notes for one-touch scanning and filing. Don't miss this issue.

How to Receive this Newsletter
Published Mondays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays, Answers to Questions is a thrice weekly newsletter in which TechnoLawyer members answer legal technology and practice management questions submitted by their peers (including you if you join TechnoLawyer). Like all of our newsletters, it's free. Please subscribe now.

Topics: Business Productivity/Word Processing | Coming Attractions | Copiers/Scanners/Printers | Technology Industry/Legal Profession | TL Answers

Little Induce Coup -- and Other Hot IP Issues

By Sara Skiff | Friday, July 15, 2005

Coming July 18, 2005 to IP Memes: You'll learn what the Supreme Court decision in the Grokster case means for P2P technology (and you), about an Internet giant that has picked a fight with typosquatters, how Brazil bullied a US drug manufacturer into lowering prices, and why trademark infringement target Columbia Pictures is laying low.

How to Receive this Newsletter
Published on Mondays, IP Memes is a biweekly newsletter that explores emerging technology-related intellectual property issues — or "memes" as we call them. Like all of our newsletters, it's free. Please subscribe now.

Topics: Coming Attractions | IP Memes | Technology Industry/Legal Profession

A Bigger Story than Displaying the Ten Commandments

By Neil J. Squillante | Thursday, July 14, 2005

It all started in Fat Friday, and has since become a long running thread there and here — courts that ban cell phones and PDAs. TechnoLawyer member Grace Lidia Suarez writes in with the latest report from the trenches: "I think the real reason is that judges have gotten completely sick and tired of phones going off in the courtroom. No matter what they say (even if they seize the phones) it still happens. And because cameras are strictly verboten, the guards are required to check cell phones to make sure they don't have cameras. BTW, the federal courthouse in San Francisco permits cell phones (but not cameras or cell phone/camera combinations) but the INS (okay, ICE or BICE, or whatever they call themselves this week) prohibits all cell phones AND has no place to hold them (beware!)"

About Quips
A Quip is a brief member contribution for which we don't have room in our Answers to Questions or Fat Friday newsletters. Instead, Quips appear first in TechnoGuide, and later here in TechnoLawyer Blog. TechnoGuide, which is free, also contains exclusive content. You can subscribe here.

Topics: Email/Messaging/Telephony | Post | Technology Industry/Legal Profession

The Modern Day Equivalent of Acceptance Speeches

By Neil J. Squillante | Friday, July 1, 2005

As you know, we announced the results of the 2005 TechnoLawyer @ Awards last week. In the old days, we used to hold a ceremony in a chat room with each winner contributing an acceptance speech. Nowadays, since virtually everyone has a Web site, we've rounded up some of the announcements from winners and finalists. Once again, congratulations to all of them!

Our Official Announcement

Jim Calloway's Announcement

Dennis Crouch's Announcement

David Moon's Press Release

Dennis Kennedy's Announcement

Bruce MacEwen's Announcement

Software Technology's Press Release

CaseVault's Press Release

CaseSoft's Press Release

Dataflight's Press Release

LexisNexis' Press Release

We'll update this Post as more announcements appear.

PS: After posting five days/week for 12 weeks since our launch, we're taking a break — no blog posts until next Friday, July 8th. Enjoy the holiday weekend!

About TechnoEditorials
A TechnoEditorial is the vehicle through which we opine and provide tips of interest to managing partners, law firm administrators, and others in the legal profession. TechnoEditorials appear first in TechnoGuide, and later here in TechnoLawyer Blog. TechnoGuide, which is free, also contains exclusive content. You can subscribe here.

Topics: TechnoLawyer | Technology Industry/Legal Profession | TL Editorial

United States' First Mover Advantage Fading Fast

By Neil J. Squillante | Monday, June 27, 2005

You've all heard about the incredible broadband Internet access in countries like Japan and South Korea — half the price we pay and up to 25 times faster. But you probably haven't heard about Mauritius, a tiny island nation off the the coast of Africa that plans to become the first nation with coast-to-coast WiFi. Meanwhile, here in the United States, Philadelphia seeks to become the first large American city with universal WiFi, but as usual, special interests are working hard to derail this plan. If I had to bet, I'd put my money on Mauritius over Philadelphia. The United States invented and then popularized the Internet, yet we are losing the broadband battle — badly. Just as I was sick and tired of dial-up speeds at the end of 1999 when I switched to DSL (I now use cable), I'm now sick and tired of what we call broadband in this country, which is not true broadband. Using the SpeedTest at BroadBandReports.com, my home download speed is 4.724 Mbps and my upload speed is 468 Kbps. Pathetic. Read about Mauritius. Read about Philadelphia. Test your broadband speed.

About TechnoEditorials
A TechnoEditorial is the vehicle through which we opine and provide tips of interest to managing partners, law firm administrators, and others in the legal profession. TechnoEditorials appear first in TechnoGuide, and later here in TechnoLawyer Blog. TechnoGuide, which is free, also contains exclusive content. You can subscribe here.

Topics: Online/Cloud | Technology Industry/Legal Profession | TL Editorial

Defending the Kyocera 7135; Treo 650 Tips; Document Management

By Neil J. Squillante | Monday, June 20, 2005

Coming June 24, 2005 to Fat Friday: Gil Marquez reviews the Kyocera 7135 (warning: this Post includes a graphic account of a cell phone dropped into a toilet bowl), Jason Havens explains how to add voice functionality to your Treo 650, Sam Craig discusses how his firm organizes its documents, William Pray provides an indispensable document management tip, and Grace Lidia Suarez urges lawyers to not use a Treo 650. Don't miss this issue.

How to Receive this Newsletter
Published on Fridays, Fat Friday is a weekly newsletter that features a grab bag full of genuinely useful product reviews and tips on a wide variety of topics. Like all of our newsletters, it's free. Please subscribe now.

Topics: Coming Attractions | Document Management | Email/Messaging/Telephony | Fat Friday | Laptops/Smartphones/Tablets | Technology Industry/Legal Profession

Getting Advanced Intel -- and Other Hot IP Issues

By Sara Skiff | Friday, June 17, 2005

Coming June 20, 2005 to IP Memes: You'll learn about the proposed changes in the patent reform bill recently presented to Congress, a bench-clearing trademark fight involving Major League Baseball, how you can work for Microsoft as a copyright snitch, and why Apple may have a beef with the Wall Street Journal for trade secret infringement.

How to Receive this Newsletter
Published on Mondays, IP Memes is a biweekly newsletter that explores emerging technology-related intellectual property issues — or "memes" as we call them. Like all of our newsletters, it's free. Please subscribe now.

Topics: Coming Attractions | IP Memes | Technology Industry/Legal Profession

The Real Reason Courts Ban Cell Phones

By Neil J. Squillante | Thursday, June 16, 2005

Regarding the recent debate in Fat Friday about why courts ban cell phones, TechnoLawyer member Kevin Grierson weighs in with his take: "As a former litigator, the answer to why cell phones are not allowed in courtrooms is quite plain: judges don't like to be interrupted. The courts in which I practiced had originally allowed pagers (before cell phones were common) provided that the pager was set to vibrate only. Unfortunately, there was always some knucklehead who forgot, and the thing would ring right in the middle of a hearing (of course). The judges grew tired of admonishing (or even fining) attorneys and other courtroom attendees for violating the rules, and finally simply banned both pagers and cell phones for everyone but police officers and deputies. Crazy as it sounds, there are even courts down here where you can't bring a PDA or computer into the courthouse unless you have special permission from the judge."

TechnoLawyer member Steven Schwaber practices in a friendlier court system, writing: "How about this, then: In the Central District of California cell phones are welcome and indeed, in a sense encouraged, to facilitate communication with clients, etc. But only if the phone does not have a camera built into it. Any other feature, fine, but they will confiscate any camera with any kind of built-in imaging until you leave the building. No reason is given for this. If security is the issue, then God help us one and all, since all they do is ask me if the phone has a camera and they take my response at face value (as if a terrorist would level with them). Go figure."

About Quips
A Quip is a brief member contribution for which we don't have room in our Answers to Questions or Fat Friday newsletters. Instead, Quips appear first in TechnoGuide, and later here in TechnoLawyer Blog. TechnoGuide, which is free, also contains exclusive content. You can subscribe here.

Topics: Email/Messaging/Telephony | Post | Technology Industry/Legal Profession
 
home my technolawyer search archives place classified blog login